“The debate about the war seems pretty robust and free. Many publicatio...” — Rich Lowry Quote

The debate about the war seems pretty robust and free. Many publications, from the New Yorker to the Nation, feel perfectly comfortable printing anti-American articles and that's fine. That's what the First Amendment is all about.

Al Gore's performances could be a case study in abnormal-psychology classes.

John Kerry couldn't even order a Philly cheesesteak properly.

Clinton's fakery was so deft and deeply ingrained that it was impossible to tell where it ended and the real Bill Clinton began. This constituted a kind of political genius.

Calculation has its advantages, but no one likes naked calculation.

1913 wasn't a very good year. 1913 gave us the income tax, the 16th amendment and the IRS.

I want to regain my First Amendment rights.

The idea of dual sovereignty rests on the premise that the power of the states to prosecute crimes existed before the creation of the federal government, and is reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.

The lived experience of Black people in the United States has demonstrated countless times that we are neither seen as 'law-abiding citizens' nor worthy of having 'ordinary self-defense needs' protected by the Second Amendment.