The most contentious Supreme Court battles are when a Republican nominates someone to replace a liberal justice.
“The most contentious Supreme Court battles are when a Republican nominates someone to replace a liberal justice.”
The World Motivation
The most contentious Supreme Court battles are when a Republican nominates someone to replace a liberal justice.
“The most contentious Supreme Court battles are when a Republican nominates someone to replace a liberal justice.”
The most contentious Supreme Court battles are when a Republican nominates someone to replace a liberal justice.
Policy proposals to ensure the integrity of ballots are routinely presented by Democrats as not just racist but as having no function other than racism.
I love all of my colleagues here at The Federalist, but everyone knows that David Harsanyi is my favorite. I will be forever grateful for the guidance and support he gave me when we started this enterprise. He is a rock. His work is consistent, productive, done to a high standard. He is supportive of his colleagues.
Yes, Trump has the support of many Christians, but it's not because they think he loves Benny Hinn or Creflo Dollar.
Dead battles, like dead generals, hold the military mind in their dead grip.
Not even Ares battles against necessity.
I feel like I'm constantly tangled in some kind of bureaucratic web and constantly making the tangible philosophical. Constantly trying to win philosophical battles and turn things into disputes about ideas rather than realities. I don't want to just talk about the thing; I want to talk about why the thing exists.
Different identity groups hold specific levels of power over others when their battles play out in the media. To wit: Black beats white. Gay beats white. Black beats gay.
Social conservatives have been involved in the pro-life movement for decades.
Being the competitive guy that I am, I can't get into individual battles like I have.