A religion, even if it calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it.
“A religion, even if it calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it.”
The World Motivation
A religion, even if it calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it.
“A religion, even if it calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it.”
Explore more quotes by Sigmund Freud on topics like Religion, wisdom, and life lessons.
“A religion, even if it calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it.”
“Civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock.”
“A woman should soften but not weaken a man.”
“In this situation, what we call natural ethics has nothing to offer but the narcissistic satisfaction of being able to think one is better than others. This is where ethics based on religion enters the scene with its promises of a better life hereafter. I am inclined to think that, for as long as virtue goes unrewarded here below, ethics will preach in vain.”
“Where id was, there ego shall be.”
“Whoever loves becomes humble. Those who love have, so to speak, pawned a part of their narcissism.”
“I find something repulsive about the idea of vicarious redemption. I would not throw my numberless sins onto a scapegoat and expect them to pass from me; we rightly sneer at the barbaric societies that practice this unpleasantness in its literal form. There's no moral value in the vicarious gesture anyway. As Thomas Paine pointed out, you may if you wish take on a another man's debt, or even to take his place in prison. That would be self-sacrificing. But you may not assume his actual crimes as if they were your own; for one thing you did not commit them and might have died rather than do so; for another this impossible action would rob him of individual responsibility. So the whole apparatus of absolution and forgiveness strikes me as positively immoral, while the concept of revealed truth degrades the concept of free intelligence by purportedly relieving us of the hard task of working out the ethical principles for ourselves.”
“Was this humanity? Was this nobility? Was this the Christian glory that presumed to hold itself above the heathen Turk? To suffer innocents be sacrificed on an altar of corruption, merely that a lofty family be spared discomfiture? Oh, this was tenfold more abominable than the crime itself, that high authority should wink at it!”
“If each side had been frankly contending for its own real wish, they would all have kept within the bounds of reason and courtesy; but just because the contention is reversed and each side is fighting the other side’s battle, all the bitterness which really flows from thwarted self-righteousness and obstinacy and from the accumulated grudges of the last ten years is concealed from them by the nominal or official "Unselfishness" of what they are doing or, at least, held to be excused by it.”